Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33904 (KAR)

SMT. PRAMEELA v. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION

WP/296/2022 · 2026-08-18

Vijaykumar A Patil

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010009182022 NC: 2026:KHC:44355 W.P. No.296/2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL WRIT PETITION NO.296/2022 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: SMT. PRAMEELA W/O UGREGOWDA M.B. AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS R/AT KRISHNANAGAR, 3RD STGE PANDAVAPURA TOWN PANDAVAPURA TALUK DIST MANDYA 571434. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. CHARAN HEGDE, ADV., FOR SRI. SHIVAPRASAD SHANTANAGOUDAR, ADV.,) AND: 1. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION HEAD OFFICE AT KSFC BHAVAN NO 1/1, THIMMAIAH ROAD BENGALURU 560052 REP. BY ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER (HP AND FC). 2. SMT. T.S. ANURADHA W/O LATE K.R. NAGESH AGED ABOUT MAJOR R/AT SHIVAKRUPA, 2ND STAGE KRISHNANAGAR, PANDAVAPURA DIST MANDYA 571434. 3. SRI. SACHIN S/O LATE K.R. NAGESH Digitally signed by RUPA V Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010009182022 NC: 2026:KHC:44355 W.P. No.296/2022 AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS R/AT SHIVAKRUPA, 2ND STAGE KRISHNANAGAR, PANDAVAPURA DIST MANDYA 571434. 4. SRI. MANJUNATHA S/O LATE K.R. NAGESH AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT SHIVAKRUPA, 2ND STAGE KRISHNANAGAR, PANDAVAPURA DIST MANDYA 571434. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. MALIPATIL P.S. ADV., FOR R1 V/O/DTD:05.12.2025 SERVICE OF NOTICE TO R2 TO R4 ARE D/W) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE IMPUGNED ORDER DTD 08.06.2021 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE AT MANDYA IN EXECUTION CASE NO.6/2011 VIDE ANNX-A. TO ALLOW THE APPLICATION FILED BY THE PETITIONER UNDER ORDER 21 RULE 58 OF CPC R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC VIDE ANNX-H & ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010009182022 NC: 2026:KHC:44355 W.P. No.296/2022 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL ORAL ORDER This petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: “a. To set aside the impugned order dated 08.06.2021 passed by the I Addl. District Judge At Mandya in Execution case No. 6/2011 (Annexure-A); b. To allow the application filed by the Petitioner under Order 21 Rule 58 of CPC r/w Section 151 of CPC (Annexure-H); c. To set aside the attachment warrant issued by the I Addl. District Judge at Mandya vide order dated 26.08.2019 and 27.09.2019 (Annexure-E); d. To pass any other order or direction as this Hon'ble Court deems fit.” 2. Heard Sri.Charan Hegde, learned counsel for Sri.Shivaprasad Shantanagoudar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri.Malipatil P.S., learned counsel for the respondent No.1 and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order passed in the execution proceedings is on an - 4 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010009182022 NC: 2026:KHC:44355 W.P. No.296/2022 application filed under Order XXI Rule 58 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, which is appealable and that he would file an appeal. 4. In view of the aforesaid submission, this petition is disposed of with the liberty to file an appeal. It is needless to observe that the petitioner would be entitled to the benefit of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, in case the appeal is filed. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of. Sd/- (VIJAYKUMAR A. PATIL) JUDGE BSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9