2026:JHHC:10227 --1-- A.B.A. No. 1475 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1475 of 2026 ---- 1. Md. Majid Hussain, aged about 18 years, son of Md. Ajaj, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS – Daru, District – Hazaribag, Jharkhand 2. Md. Jiyahul Haq @ Md. Zayaul Haq, aged about 21 years, son of Md. Jalani, resident of kablasi Daru, PO and PS – Daru, District – Hazaribag Jharkhand 3. Salauddin, aged about 40 years, son of Md. Nejam Miyan, resident of kablasi Daru, PO and PS – Daru, District – Hazaribag Jharkhand 4. Mohammad Rajak, aged about 68 years, son of Late Sahbali Miyan, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS – Daru, District – Hazaribag, Jharkhand 5. Sahid Afridi, aged about 18 years, son of Anul Miyan, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS – Daru, District – Hazaribag, Jharkhand 6. Varish Hussain, aged about 36 years, son of Late Kolha Miya, resident of Kablasi Daru, PO and PS – Daru, District – Hazaribag, Jharkhand .... Petitioners -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand .... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioners :- Mr. Shailesh Kr. Pandey, Advocate For the State :- Mrs. Priya Shrestha, Advocate ---- 02/09.04.2026 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Daru P.S. Case No.61 of 2025 for the alleged offences 2026:JHHC:10227 --2-- A.B.A. No. 1475 of 2026 registered under Sections 115(2), 117(2), 126(2), 74, 109(1), 324(2), 303(2), 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Hazaribagh. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case due to previous enmity and 37 persons have been made accused and there are general and omnibus allegation against all the accused persons of assault. He further submits that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.14 of the petition. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that allegations are there of assault. 5. On perusal of the FIR it transpires that there are general and omnibus allegation against 37 persons of assault and the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent as disclosed in paragraph No.14 of the petition and it has been pointed out that due to previous enmity the petitioners have been implicated in the case and in that view of the matter the petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioners on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated 09.04.2026 Sangam/