Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 339 (HP)

SEEMA RANA v. THE STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/1848/2026 · 2026-02-13

Romesh Verma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:HHC:3488 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH SHIMLA CWP No. 1848 of 2026 Decided on : 13.02.2026 _______________________________________________________ Seema Rana ...Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents ________________________________________________________ Coram Hon'ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Vacation Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the petitioner: Ms. Kiran Lata Negi, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Romesh Verma, Judge (Oral) The petitioner has approached this Court for the following main reliefs: (i) “That the respondents may kindly be directed to consider the case of the petitioner for her transfer from GHS Datyar u/c GMSSS Rajri Jabli, District Solan, HP to GSSS Talyahar, District Mandi, HP against vacant post keeping in view of her adverse family circumstances and as per the provisions of transfer policy; (ii) That the respondents may kindly be directed to decide the representation of the petitioner contained in Annexure P-3 in a time bound manner.” 2. During the course of the arguments, the 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be satisfied in case the respondents are directed to decide the representation dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P-3) of the petitioner preferably within a time-bound manner. 3. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents/authority to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 09.01.2026 (Annexure P-3) sympathetically within a period of two weeks’ from today by passing a speaking order and after giving an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and the same shall be communicated to the petitioner. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed anything on the merits of the case, and the authority shall take a decision strictly in consonance with the provisions of law. 5. Petition stands disposed of, so also the pending application(s), if any. 13 th February, 2026 ( Romesh Verma ) (Shamsh Tabrez) Vacation Judge