SABIR AHAMAD HALDER @ SABIR AHAMMAD HALDER v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL
CRM (A)/2633/2026 · 2026-08-20
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33896 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33896 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
D/L569 20.08.2026 Bpg.
C.R.M. (A) 2633 of 2026
In Re: An application for Anticipatory Bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Dadpur Police Station Case No.117 of 2026 dated 08.04.2026 under Sections 85/118(2)/109/316(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 3/ 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961;
Sabir Ahamad Halder @ Sabir Ahammad Halder Versus The State of West Bengal
Mr. Suman Chakraborty. …for the petitioner.
Mr. Subhasish Pachhal Ms. Shyanti Podder. …for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the husband. There has been a marital dispute for which the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case.
State submits that within five years of marriage there was a huge demand of dowry and to that effect physical assault was inflicted upon the victim resulting in serious injuries.
I have taken into account the statement of the victim. Petitioner is not similarly placed as the other accused person. As such, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner in
2 CRM(A)2633 of 2026 is dismissed.
Memo of Evidence submitted by the State be kept with the record.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.
Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)