Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33891 (CAL)

SIKHA BAIDYA AND ANR v. SAMIR BAIDYA

CO/2744/2026 · 2026-08-19

Hiranmay Bhattacharyya

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Item- 27. sg 19-08-2026 Ct. 6 CO 2744 of 2026 Sikha Baidya & Anr. Versus Samir Baidya Mr. Sarbananda Sanyal Mr. Samrat Chakraborty …for the petitioners This application under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is at the instance of the preemptees praying for direction upon the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court at Barasat, to dispose of the Misc. Case No. 3 of 2023 (Pre), expeditiously. From the order sheets appended to this application, this Court finds that 20th February, 2027 is fixed for hearing of the injunction application. In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to serve notice upon the opposite party. However the learned Advocate-on-Record for the petitioner shall be obliged to forward a copy of this application along with a server copy of this order to the opposite party forthwith. In the light of the submission made by the learned Advocate for the petitioners, this civil revisional application stands disposed of by requesting the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division), 1st Court, at Barasat, to take up hearing of the application for injunction on the next date fixed, if the same is otherwise ready for hearing and make an endeavour to dispose of the same as expeditiously as possible, but preferably within a period of 12 weeks from date without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. 2 Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all formalities. (Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J.)