Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3389 (KAR)

MR. GOPAL, v. M/S. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD.,

CRL.RP/353/2026 · 2026-04-09

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19980 CRL.RP No. 353 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.353 OF 2026 (397(Cr.PC) / 438(BNSS) BETWEEN: MR. GOPAL, S/O PUDDA, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT H.NO.2-41, KARADI MANE, KAMAJAL, NEAR PORKODI TEMPLE, KENJARU POST, MANGALURU TALUK - 574 142 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JEEVAN K, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO.LTD., A PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY INCORPARATED UNDER REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.123, ANGAPPA NAICHKEN STREET, CHENNAI-1 ALSO HAVING ITS BRANCH OFFICE AT SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE CO. LTD., 2ND FLOOR, PARADIGM PLAZA, NEAR A.B SHETTY CIRCLE, MANGALURU-01 REPRESENTED BY ITS OFFICER AND G.P.A. HOLDER- MR. BHASKAR, Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19980 CRL.RP No. 353 of 2026 AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, S/O KRISHNAPPA …RESPONDENT (BY SRI NARAYANA SWAMY D, ADVOCATE) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 R/W 442 OF BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT PASSED BY THE II ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, D.K., MANGALURU IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO 226/2024 DATED 04-11- 2025 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION DATED 27/08/2024 IN C.C. NO.215/2024 PASSED BY THE J.M.F.C. IX COURT, MANGALURU, D.K. AND TO DIRECT THE ACQUITTAL OF THE ACCUSED/PETITIONER. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the revision petitioner has filed the memo for withdrawal which reads as under: “That the petitioner above named is not willing to proceed further in the above case. Hence, the above criminal revision petition may kindly be dismissed as withdrawn in the interest of justice.” 2. Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE kcm List No.: 2 Sl No.: 49