Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33884 (MAD)

Tvl Sri Senthamil Palporul Santhai v. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer

WP/20862/2026 · 2026-06-11

Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

WP No. 20862 of 2026 __________ IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11.06.2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY WP No. 20862 of 2026 and WMP Nos. 22511, 22513 & 22514 of 2026 Tvl Sri Senthamil Palporul Santhai Represented by its Proprietrix - Saraswathy Sampath Kumar, No.7/62-2HI, Kallukuli Bus stop, Keerantham Main Road, Saravanampatti, Coimbatore-641 035. ..Petitioner Vs 1. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Annur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore-III -641 653. 2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) Annur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore-641 653. 3. The Bank Manager Union Bank of India, 224, 100 Feet Road, Gandhipuram, Tatabad, Coimbatore-641 012. ..Respondents Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of certiorari to call for the records in impugned order in DRC-07 dated 18.11.2025 bearing reference No. ZD331125315359K along with the detailed order dated 18.11.2025 issued under Section 73 of the CGST Act on the file of the 1st Respondent for financial year 2021- 2022 and quash the same. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20862 of 2026 __________ For Petitioner: Mr.Gunjan Prabhakaran For Respondents: Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, Government Counsel (Tax) for R1 and R2 ORDER An order dated 18.11.2025 is impugned primarily on the ground of breach of principles of natural justice. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Counsel (Tax), accepts notice for the first and second respondents. 3. The period of limitation for filing an appeal has expired. On instructions, learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to pay 25% of the disputed tax demand. An endorsement to that effect is made on the bundle. 4. Subject to the condition that the petitioner remits 25% of the disputed tax demand, as agreed to, within thirty days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, the impugned order is set aside and the matter is remanded for re-consideration. After providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner, a fresh order shall be issued within three months from the date of remittance of 25% of the disputed tax demand. In view of the impugned order being set aside, the attachment of the bank account of the petitioner made pursuant thereto stands raised. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20862 of 2026 __________ 5. The writ petition is disposed of on the above terms. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 11.06.2026 Index: Yes/No Neutral Citation: Yes/No mmi To 1. The Deputy Commercial Tax Officer Annur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore-III -641 653. 2. The Assistant Commissioner (ST)(FAC) Annur Assessment Circle, Coimbatore-641 653. 3. The Bank Manager Union Bank of India, 224, 100 Feet Road, Gandhipuram, Tatabad, Coimbatore-641 012. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 20862 of 2026 __________ SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY, J. mmi WP No. 20862 of 2026 11.06.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis