Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33882 (PNJ)

KAMLESH KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/8898/2026 · 2026-07-27

Surya Partap Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP No.8898 of 2026 (O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 119 CRWP No.8898 of 2026 (O&M) Date of Decision :27.07.2026 Kamlesh Kaur and another ......Petitioners Versus State of Haryana and others ...... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE SURYA PARTAP SINGH Present : None for the petitioners. Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana. SURYA PARTAP SINGH , J . (Oral) : 1. Despite repeated calls, nobody has appeared on behalf of petitioner. Waited sufficiently. 2. The instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for directions to the respondents No.2 and 3 to protect their life and liberty from the respondents No.6 to 8. 3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 5 only. 4. Since advance notice has already been served upon the State, Mr. Ramender Singh Chauhan, AAG, Haryana, has appeared on behalf of respondent-State. Hence, service of notice upon the State is hereby dispensed with. 5. The record has been perused with the help of learned State counsel representing the respondents No.1 to 5. 6. A perusal of record shows that the petitioners have filed a representation dated 21.07.2026 (Annexure P-3) before the respondent No.2- MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.28 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CRWP No.8898 of 2026 (O&M) 2 Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad. 7. In the interest of justice, it shall be appropriate that a direction is given to Superintendent of Police, Fatehabad to dispose of the above- mentioned representation by passing a speaking order. 8. Keeping in view the aforesaid facts, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioners (Annexure P-3) by passing a speaking order within a period of 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of instant order. 9. It is further directed that the petitioners shall be provided adequate safety and security to protect their life and liberty, if required. It is, however, clarified that any observation is not being made by this Court with regard to threat perception to the petitioners or the validity of the relationship of the petitioners. The police authority of District Fatehabad shall be at liberty to make an independent assessment with regard to threat perception to the petitioners, and take a decision on the issue of providing adequate security to them. (SURYA PARTAP SINGH) JUDGE 27.07.2026 Manoj Bhutani Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MANOJ KUMAR 2026.07.28 10:46 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document