- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010241752026 NC: 2026:KHC:43506 WP No. 11416 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO. 11416 OF 2026 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SMT. BASAMMA W/O LATE LINGAPPA, AGED ABOUT 90 YEARS, R/O LAKKURU VILLAGE, RAMANATHAPURA HOBLI, ARAKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHASTRI GANAPATI SHRIPAD, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER HASSAN DISTRICT HASSAN - 573 201. 2. SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER ABOLITION OF INAM, HASSAN DIVISION, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 201. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, SAKALESHPURA SUB-DIVISION, SAKALESHPURA, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 134. Digitally signed by CHAYA S A Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010241752026 NC: 2026:KHC:43506 WP No. 11416 of 2026 4. TAHASILDAR ARAKALAGUDU HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. SPOORTHY HEGDE N, HCGP) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I. ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER WRIT / ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT NOS. 3 AND 4 TO ENTER THE NAME OF PETITIONER IN REVENUE RECORDS OF LAND TO AN EXTENT OF 3 ACRE 6 GUNTAS IN SY. NO.1, SITUATED AT LAKKUR VILLAGE, RAMANATHPURA HOBLI, HASSAN BY DELETING THE NAME OF SRI SANGAMESHWARA DEVARU AND ETC., THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Learned High Court Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents. 2. In this Writ Petition, petitioner has sought to consider the application dated 10.02.2026 made by her at Annexure-K seeking direction to respondent Nos.3 and 4 to enter the name of the petitioner in revenue records of land to the extent of 3 acre 6 guntas in Sy.No.1, situated at Lakkur Village, Ramanathapura Hobli, Arakalagud Taluk, - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010241752026 NC: 2026:KHC:43506 WP No. 11416 of 2026 Hassan District, based on the order passed by the Land Tribunal on 17.03.1975. 3. Taking into consideration the fact that the petitioner is seeking transfer of katha based on the order passed by the Land Tribunal and as there is delay of 51 years, the name of the petitioner is not found in the revenue records, and therefore, I am of the view that, no interference is called for in this Writ Petition. It is open for the petitioner to establish her right over the land in question in a manner known to law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 19