CWP-22080-2026 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (151) CWP-22080-2026 Date of Decision: - 20.07.2026 M/s G.S.M. Technologies Private Limited ....Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others .....Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present:- Mr. Amitabh Tewari, Advocate for the petitioner. (Through VC). Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana. Mr. Akshay Bhan, Senior Advocate, with Mr. D.B. Bhargav, Advocate Mr. Harsh Vasu Gupta, Advocate for Dr. Veena Anand. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. Present civil writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of mandamus to direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to present an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner company before deciding the application dated 20.09.2022 seeking transfer of Plot No.4 at HSIIDC, Udyog Vihar, Phase VII, Sector 35, Gurugram. Other prayers have also been made in the present writ petition. NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.27 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CWP-22080-2026 -2- 2. Learned senior counsel appearing for Dr. Veena Anand, has submitted that in view of the compromise deed dated 22.12.2021, decree was passed in favour of Dr. Veena Anand in CS-2134-2021. It is further submitted that an application was filed by the petitioner under Order 23 Rule 3-A CPC in the CS-283-2022, which was withdrawn and even subsequently another supplementary compromise deed was entered into. It is stated that the said Dr. Veena Anand had filed a petition i.e. CWP- 2952-2023 in which the Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court vide order dated 17.04.2026 had given the following directions: - “5. Upon instructions from Mr. Aditya Dahiya, Managing Director, HSIIDC, counsel for respondents–HSIIDC has made a statement that application dated 20.09.2022 (Annexure P-27) shall be decided after giving due opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, within a period of three months from today. 6. Accordingly, competent authority is directed to decide application Annexure P-27 within three months after hearing the petitioner. Liberty is given to the petitioner to move an appropriate representation to the competent authority qua prayer (iv) within a period of one month from today. In case, such representation is given, the same shall be decided within a period of two months thereafter. 7. With the above directions, writ petition is disposed of. 8. Liberty is given to the petitioner to approach this Court afresh in case he is aggrieved with the order(s) passed by the competent authority. 9. Pending miscellaneous applications stand disposed of. April 17, 2026” 3. It is submitted that the present petitioner had filed CM- 20399-CWP-2024 and CM-20400-CWP-2024 to intervene in the said NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.27 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CWP-22080-2026 -3- case and had subsequently withdrawn the said applications, vide order dated 23.03.2026. A copy of the said order has been handed over to the Court, which is taken on record and has been marked as “Mark A” and the same is reproduced herein below: - “Present: Mr. Tushar Sharma, Advocate and Mr. D.B. Bhargava, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Parvinder Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate with Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl.A.G., Haryana. Mr. R.K. Handa, Advocate for the intervener. **** CM-17766-CWP-2023 Counsel for the petitioner states that the application has become infructuous as order dated 25.08.2023, which is being sought to be modified, has been complied with. To be taken up with the main case. CM-20081-CWP-2023 and CM-20082-CWP-2023 Issue notice of the applications to the non- applicants/respondents. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice on behalf of respondents. He seeks time to file response. To be taken up with the main case. CM-1492-CWP-2026 Prayer in the application is for permission to withdraw application (CM-20400-CWP-2024) for intervention. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. Application is allowed. CM-20399-CWP-2024 and CM-20400-CWP-2024 Mr. Handa, counsel for the intervener states that the intervenor has already disposed of the property in favour of the petitioner, who is bound to take care all the dues. He seeks and is granted permission to withdraw both the applications. NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.27 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement CWP-22080-2026 -4- Dismissed as withdrawn. Response is still awaited from the contesting respondents. To be taken up with the main case. CWP-2952-2023(O&M) Counsel for the petitioner states that the entire amount demanded by HSIIDC till date on various accounts has been duly paid, but the property has not been transferred. List on 17.04.2026. To be shown in the urgent cause list. 23.03.2026” 4. It is submitted that passing any direction as prayed in the present petition would be in conflict with the order dated 17.04.2026 and would also result in modifying the said order passed by the Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court, which order has attained finality. It is further submitted that moving of the said applications by the petitioner as an intervener and passing of order dated 23.03.2026 has not been mentioned in the present writ petition. 5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that in the said circumstances, he be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition. 6. Dismissed as withdrawn, as prayed for. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE July 20, 2026 naresh.k Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No NARESH KUMAR 2026.07.27 16:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document/judgement