Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3387 (CHH)

Amar Singh v. SMT. SHIVKANTIBAI (DIED) THOUGH LEGAL HEIRS

FA/96/2013 · 2026-01-06

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:878 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 96 of 2013 Amar Singh S/o Shiv Singh Parihar Aged About 68 Years R/o Patharra, P.O. Marka, Tah. Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham C.G., Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Smt. Shivkantibai (dead) Though Legal Heirs 1(A) Mahraj Singh Thakur S/o Hem Singh Thakur Aged About 67 Years R/o Kali Mai Ward, Mungeli, P.S. Tahsil And District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Devideen S/o Jagatdhari Aged About 51 Years R/o Jagtakapa, Near Village Chandergarhi, P.O. Bhatgaon, Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 3 - Ramlal S/o Jagatdhari Aged About 48 Years R/o Jagtakapa, Near Village Chandergarhi, P.O. Bhatgaon, Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 4 - Rajmani Singh @ Rajman Singh S/o Manik Singh Aged About 56 Years R/o C.M. Complex, Mungeli, Post, P.S. And Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 5 - Jara Singh S/o Hem Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Uslapur Near SOURABH BHILWAR Digitally signed by SOURABH BHILWAR Date: 2026.01.08 18:31:19 +0530 2 Village Pauni, Post- Tenradhoura, P.S. And Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 6 - Ramlochan Singh S/o Hem Singh Aged About 58 Years R/o Uslapur Near Village Pauni, Post- Tenradhoura, P.S. And Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh S/o Thru- Collector, Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G., District : Mungeli, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Appellant : None For Respondents No.1A, 5 & 6 : Mr. Abhipreet Bajpai, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent/ State : Mr. Anand Gupta, Dy. Govt. Advocate (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE BIBHU DATTA GURU) Order on Board 07/01/2026 1. None appears nor any representation made on behalf of the appellant to press this appeal on repeated calls. 2. In view of the above, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in pursuing the present matter. 3. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- (BIBHU DATTA GURU) JUDGE $. Bhilwar