IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8417 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- Patauna District- Madhubani ====================================================== Runa Devi Wife of Vishnudev Yadav @ Bishnudev Yadav @ Bablu Yadav Resident of Village- Suhansh, P.S.- Patauna, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sharda Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJIT KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 17-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Patauna P.S. Case No.93 of 2025, F.I.R dated 08.11.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(1), 109(1), 352, 351(2), 303(2) and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. According to prosecution case, on 25.10.2025, the informant, Raj Kumar Yadav, alleged that his neighbors, Bishnudev Yadav @ Bablu Yadav, Suraj Yadav, and Runa Devi (petitioner) came to his house armed with clubs and began abusing him. When he objected, Bishnudev Yadav attacked him with a spade, causing injury to his knee. When the informant’s mother, Bauwadai Devi, intervened, she was also injured with a spade. His wife, Triveni Devi, was allegedly assaulted with clubs and a rod by Suraj Yadav and Runa Devi. It is further Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8417 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 2/3 alleged that Suraj Yadav outraged Triveni Devi’s modesty and took obscene photographs of her. Additionally, Bishnudev Yadav allegedly took Rs. 1,500 in cash from the informant, and Suraj Yadav took a gold mangalsutra from Triveni Devi. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the allegations are general and omnibus and the petitioner had no knowledge regarding the said occurrence and the entire prosecution story is false and concocted and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail application. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner rather the allegations are general and omnibus and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Accordingly, this Court is inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 7. Let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his/her arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8417 of 2026(2) dt.17-02-2026 3/3 satisfaction of the learned J.M. 1st Class, Benipatti, Madhubani, in connection with Patauna P.S. Case No.93 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure / Section 482(2) of the Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita and with other following conditions:- (i) one of the bailors should be the family member/relative of the petitioner(s) who shall provide official document to show his/her bona fide; (ii) the petitioner(s) shall appear on each and every date before the Trial Court and failure to do so for two consecutive dates without plausible reason will entail cancellation of his/her/their bail bond by the Trial Court itself; (iii) the petitioner(s) shall in no way try to induce or promise or threat the witnesses or tamper with the evidences, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of the bail bonds; (iv) the petitioner(s) shall desist from committing any criminal offence again, failing which the State shall be at liberty to take steps for cancellation of their bail bonds. sharun/- (Ajit Kumar, J) U T