IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9160 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2016 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Ramprit Yadav Son of Late Bundi Yadav Resident of Village -Thallubigha PS- Ghosi Distt -Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vibhuti Ranjan Sonvadra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mrs. Renuka Ratanakar (App125) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 06-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 427, 436, 504, 506 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 15, 18, 19 and 20 of U.A.P. Act. 3. As per written report, Vinod Kumar Yadav sustained injury at the place of occurrence who was proprietor of M/s. Vinod Kumar Yadav Construction Agency. He was constructing Railway Bridge. He informed the police that under the leadership of Praduman Sharma, extremists demanded levy earlier in lieu to construction of Railway Bridge and when he saw his inability, extremists burnt four vehicles, assaulted and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9160 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 2/3 injured his staff Kailash Yadav and other labourers. He dislcosed that in course of assault and burning, the extremists were calling each other with their names. He further disclosed the name of 63 accused persons including these petitioners. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is not palpable that accused persons while committing the offence will call each other with their names and it is also not palpable that one may remember the names of 63 persons. The nature of allegations is general and omnibus. It has further been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated several accused persons have already been granted bail by learned Co-ordinate Benches of this Court vide Annexure- P/2 series which has been annexed in the file of Cr. Misc. No. 70362 of 2025. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 13.11.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9160 of 2026(2) dt.06-02-2026 3/3 petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 264 of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Nawada. durgesh/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T