Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33812 (CAL)

NIVEDITA MITRA v. SOUMEN MITRA

FAT/338/2019 · 2026-08-12

Ravi Krishan Kapur, Rishad Medora

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

12.08.2026 Ct. No. 17 Sl. No. 63 RANJAN FAT 338 of 2019 NIVEDITA MITRA VS. SOUMEN MITRA None appears on behalf of either of the parties nor is any adjournment prayed for on their behalf even in the third call. The matter had appeared on 09.07.2026 when neither of the parties were represented. The Report filed on behalf of the Department also suggests that no steps have been taken by the appellant in complying with the necessary formalities. In view of the non-appearance of the parties, FAT 338 of 2019 along with all pending applications, if any stands dismissed for default. Interim orders, if any, stand vacated. The Department is directed to send a copy of this order along with the Trial Court Records, if any to the concerned District Court. [RAVI KRISHAN KAPUR, J.] [RISHAD MEDORA, J.]