Yella @ V.Dinesh v. The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/13955/2026 · 2026-06-10
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33810 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33810 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRL OP No. 13955 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 10-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN CRL OP No. 13955 of 2026 Yella @ V.Dinesh ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Inspector of Police Virinchipuram Police Station, Vellore District. (Crime No.54 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) Prayer:- Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 482 of BNSS, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.54 of 2026 pending on the file of respondent. For Petitioner(s): Mr.B.Jawahar For Respondent(s): M/s.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Criminal Side) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Section 309 (4) of BNS Act, in Crime No.54 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail.
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused robbed a Vivo V17 mobile phone, a perfume worth approximately Rs.2000/- and Rs.600/- in cash from the defacto-complainant’s bike. Hence, the case. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13955 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any conditions that may be imposed by this Court and that he is ready to cooperate with the investigation. Hence, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent Police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that the petitioner has one previous case and has been regularly doing similar nature of offences. Hence, he opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. 5.From the submissions made by the learned Government Advocate (Criminal side), it is pellucid that the petitioner has misused the liberty which had been granted by this Court in earlier point of time. Hence, this is not a fit case to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, this Criminal Original petition is dismissed. 10-06-2026 ep https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13955 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 To:- 1.The Inspector of Police Virinchipuram Police Station, Vellore District. 2.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRL OP No. 13955 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 C.KUMARAPPAN, J. EP CRL OP No. 13955 of 2026 10-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis