1 CGHC010224372025 2026:CGHC:36577-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 536 of 2025 1 - Mrs. Ila Gupta W/o Shri D.K. Gupta Aged About 56 Years R/o House No. 03, Jalasya Marg, Choubey Colony, Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - Rajesh Kumar Sharma S/o Late Bisahu Prasad Sharma Aged About 70 Years R/o A-32, Vidya Nagar, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Mrs. Kiran Tiwari W/o Dr. Prashant Tiwari Aged About 72 Years R/o Vinoba Nagar, Bilaspur, Tehsil And District Bilaspur (Cg) 3 - Mrs. Sushmita Sharma W/o Shri J.K. Sharma Aged About 59 Years R/o House No. 60, Lavista, Raipur, Tehsil And District Raipur (C.G) 4 - Mrs. Ruchi Sharma W/o Girdhar Kalyanaraman Aged About 44 Years R/o Flat No. 54, Maruti Lifestyle, Mahoba Bazaar, Raipur (C.G) 5 - Rohit Sharma S/o Arun Kumar Sharma Aged About 40 Years R/o Flat No. 54, Maruti Lifestyle, Mahoba Bazaar, Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : None For Respondents : Mr. Sameer Rigri, Advocate D.B. Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Hon’ble Shri Sachin Singh Rajput, Judge JUDGMENT ON BOARD Per Parth Prateem Sahu J. 2 17/08/2026 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition praying for following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the impugned judgment and order dated 07.05.2025 passed by the said appellate authority. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of Appeal No. 37A/2024 from the Rent Control Appellate Authority, Raipur. 10.3 Any other relief or relief(s) which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit or proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.” 2. Considering the fact that there is no representation on behalf of the appellant, this Court directed for issuance of SPC to the appellant for her appearance. As per the service report, SPC sent to the petitioner could not be served because ‘appellant left the house’. 3. Learned counsel for the Respondents submits that according to his instructions, the appellant has vacated the suit premises and keys have also been handed over to the respondent. 4. The appeal is filed through an Advocate Mr. Mayur Khandelwal. However, he remained absent on 23.06.2026, 28.07.2026 and today also. In the aforementioned facts of the case, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss this case for want of prosecution. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) (Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY