Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 338 (JHR)

VIJAY KUMAR v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/4377/2023 · 2026-02-02

Rajesh Kumar

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:2602 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.4377 of 2023 ---- Vijay Kumar aged about 42 years, son of Kamal Prasad, Resident of village Thakur Toli, P.O.+P.S.- Simdega, District – Simdega. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through Chief Secretary, Project Bhavan, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S. – Jagarnathpur, District – Ranchi. 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Simdega, P.O & P.S.- Simdega, District-Simdega, Jharkhand. 3. Project Director, Integrated Tribal Development Agency (I.T.D.A.), Simdega, P.O. & P.S. Simdega, District Ranchi. 4. Sub-Divisional Officer, Simdega, P.O & P.S.- Simdega, District- Simdega, Jharkhand. 5. Deputy Collector of District Nazarat, Simdega, P.O & P.S.- Simdega, District Simdega, Jharkhand. 6. District Sport Officer, Simdega, P.O & P.S- Simdega, District- Simdega, Jharkhand. 7. Executive Engineer, Building Construction Department, Building Division, Simdega, P.O & P.S- Simdega, District- Simdega, Jharkhand. 8. Executive Engineer, Rural Development Special Division, Simdega, P.Ο & P.S- Simdega, District- Simdega, Jharkhand. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : None For the Respondent(s) : A.C. to A.G. ---- 05/Dated: 02nd February, 2026 1. It has been pointed out by the other side that admitted claim raised in the present writ petition has already been paid. 2. Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to pursue the present writ petition. Even the defect(s) has not been removed although the writ has been filed on 04.08.2023. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) Dated: 02nd February, 2026 Amar/- Uploaded on 04.02.2026