Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 338 (HP)

RAKESH KUMAR v. THE STATE OF HP ANOTHER

CWP/50/2026 · 2026-01-02

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 50/2026 Decided on: 02.01.2026 Rakesh Kumar …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Anr. .…Respondents. ……………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Ms. Afreen Kaushal, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, J Notice. Mr. L.N. Sharma, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Petitioner is serving as Trained Graduate Teacher (Arts) at Government Senior Secondary School Gehra, District Chamba, H.P. stated to be a difficult area. His case is that on completion of much more than requisite tenure at the aforesaid station and faced with adverse family circumstances, he preferred a representation on 17.10.2025 (Annexure P-2) to respondent No.2/competent authority seeking transfer to a place of his 1Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? yes 2 preference, but the said representation has not been considered and decided till date. 3. Looking to the limited grievance of the petitioner, this writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No.2/competent authority to consider and decide the aforesaid representation of the petitioner, in accordance with law, within a period of four weeks from today. The order so passed be also communicated to the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 2nd January, 2026(rohit)