Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 338 (CHH)

SHRI MUKESH PATNAYAK v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/2922/2023 · 2026-01-27

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:4769 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2922 of 2023 Shri Mukesh Patnayak S/o G.N. Patnayak Aged About 49 Years R/o Ayodhya Nagar Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. --- Petitioner. versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director General Of Police, Police Head Quarter, Civil Line, P.S. Civil Line, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Mahasamund, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. 4 - Inspector General Of Police, Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents. WPS No. 2865 of 2024 Shri Mukesh Patnayak S/o G.N. Patnayak Aged About 50 Years R/o Police Quarter Bemcha Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.) ---Petitioner. Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home And Police Affairs, Secretariat, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, P.S. And Post Rakhi, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. AVINASH SHARMA Digitally signed by AVINASH SHARMA 2 2 - Director General Of Police Police Head Quarter, Civil Line, P.S. Civil Line, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Superintendent Of Police Mahasamund, District Mahasamund (C.G.). 4 - The Inspector General Of Police Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondents. For Petitioner : Shri Badruddin Khan, Advocate. For State/Respondent : Shri Hariom Rai, PL. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 28/01/2026 1. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that despite of information sent to the petitioner, he is not coming forward to file rejoinder etc. and it seems that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the cases. 2. In view of the submission made by counsel for the petitioner, the Writ Petitions are dismissed due to non instructions from the petitioner. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to revive the Writ Petitions, if he so desires. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Avinash