Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33798 (PNJ)

MANOJ v. STATE OF HARYANA

CRM-M/29919/2026 · 2026-07-27

Jasjit Singh Bedi

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRM-M-29919-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH (213) CRM-M-29919-2026 (O & M) Date of decision: 27.07.2026 Manoj ... Petitioner V/s State of Haryana ...Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASJIT SINGH BEDI Present: Mr. Manjet Singh Gahlawat, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Vipul Sherwal, AAG, Haryana. **** JASJIT SINGH BEDI, J. (Oral) The petitioner seeks the grant of anticipatory bail under Section 482 BNSS, 2023 (438 Cr.P.C.) in case bearing FIR No.294 dated 14.05.2021 under Sections 406 and 420 IPC (Sections 316 and 318 BNS) registered at Police Station City Hansi, District Hansi. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pursuant to the interim order dated 22.05.2026 passed by this Court, the petitioner has joined the investigation. The learned State counsel on instructions submits that the petitioner has joined the investigation in terms of the order dated 22.05.2026 and is not required for custodial interrogation. In view of the above, the interim order dated 22.05.2026 is made absolute. SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.27 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh CRM-M-29919-2026 (O & M) However, the petitioner shall keep on joining the investigation as and when required to do so and he shall abide by the conditions as envisaged under Section 482(2) BNSS. The petition stands disposed of. July 27, 2026 ( JASJIT SINGH BEDI) sukhpreet JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No SUKHPREET KAUR 2026.07.27 16:59 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document chandigarh