NISHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/8868/2026 · 2026-07-27
N S Shekhawat
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33797 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33797 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH SR. NO.115
CRWP-8868-2026 DECIDED ON:27.07.2026 NISHAN SINGH AND ANOTHER …PETITIONER(S) VERSUS VS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.S.SHEKHAWAT Present: Mr. Atinderpal Singh, Advocate for the petitioners.
N.S. SHEKHAWAT, J.
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition with a prayer to direct respondents No.2 and 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and also direct to respondents No.4 to 8 not to interfere in their lives and liberty.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already submitted a representation dated 16.07.2026 (Annexure P-5) to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur and the petitioners shall be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No.2 to look into their representation (Annexure P-5).
3. Notice of motion to respondents No.1 to 3 only, at this stage.
4. Mr. M.S. Bajwa, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 3.
5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2026.07.27 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh
CRWP-8868-2026 -2-
6. In view of the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners and without expressing anything on the merits and claim of the parties, respondent No.2-the Senior Superintendent of Police, Gurdaspur is
directed to depute a senior police officer to look into the representation (Annexure P-5) and after seeking a report, he may pass an appropriate orders, in accordance with law.
7. This order shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the validity of the marriage of the petitioners. The parties mentioned in the petition or any other person mentioned in the petition shall be at liberty to take recourse to appropriate law, if any.
8. With these observations, this petition is disposed of. 27.07.2026 (N.S.SHEKHAWAT) mks JUDGE Whether Speaking/Reasoned: YES / NO Whether Reportable:
YES / NO MUKESH KUMAR SALUJA 2026.07.27 17:08 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document High Court Chandigarh