CRL OP No. 13853 of 2026 __________ Page1 of 4 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 13853 of 2026 Ilayaselvam V ..Petitioner(s) Vs STATE REP BY. The Inspector of Police Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District. (Crime No. 86 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023 to enlarge the Petitioners on Anticipatory bail in the event of their arrest concered in Crime No. 86 of 2026, on the file of the Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District. For Petitioner(s): M/S. KAMALA KANTH S For Respondent(s): MS.R.S.INDIRA, GOVT.ADVOCATE (CRL.SIDE) ORDER The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 296(b), 118(1), 351(3) of BNS, in Crime No.86 of 2026, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that due to wordy quarrel, the petitioner https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13853 of 2026 __________ Page2 of 4 abused and assaulted the defacto complainant. Due to which, the defacto complainant sustained injuries. Hence the complaint. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready and willing to furnish substantial sureties for his due release and to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Hon'ble Court and therefore, he prayed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police submits that the investigation is not yet completed and if the petitioner is granted anticipatory bail, there is a possibility that he will tamper the witnesses and hamper the investigation. He would further submit that four similar previous cases pending against the petitioner and hence he vehemently opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Taking into consideration the allegations and also the bad antecedent of the petitioner and the fact that the case is in the initial stage of the investigation and that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is essential, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13853 of 2026 __________ Page3 of 4 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 11-06-2026 GBI To 1.The Inspector of Police, Brammadesam Police Station, Villupuram District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 13853 of 2026 __________ Page4 of 4 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. GBI CRL OP No. 13853 of 2026 11-06-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis