Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33792 (CAL)

PRIYALAL MALLICK AND ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.

WPA/18705/2026 · 2026-08-13

Shampa Dutt Paul

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

13.08.2026 Item no. 13 Court no. 30 g.b. 266012 WPA 18705 of 2026 Priyalal Mallick & Ors. Vs. Union of India & Ors. Mr. Swarup Paul Mr. Anish Roy ….For the Petitioners Mr. Aninda Bhattacharya ….For the Union of India 1. Leave is granted to learned advocate on record to correct the date in the prayer portion of the writ application. 2. Affidavit of service filed be taken on record. 3. On being served, Union of India is being represented. 4. The petitioners have preferred this writ application praying for direction upon the respondent no.3, who has not acted upon their representation which has been pending since 26th December, 2024. It appears that almost two years have passed and the respondent no.3 is silent on the said representation placed by the petitioners. 5. Considering the said facts, the writ application is disposed of with the direction that the respondent no.3 shall consider the case of the petitioners herein as made out in its representation dated 26.12.2024 within a period of 30 days from the date of communication of this order on hearing the 2 parties and passing a reasoned order in accordance with law. 6. The writ application stands disposed of. 7. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on urgent basis after completion of all necessary formalities. ( Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)