Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33785 (PAT)

Vikash Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./8763/2026 · 2026-02-04

R P Mishra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8763 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-230 Year-2024 Thana- BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL District- Begusarai ====================================================== Vikash Kumar @ Vikesh Kumar S/o- Umesh Mahto R/v- Ahmadpur W.No- 14, Shiv Nagar Ghaghara Ps- Bakhri Dist- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Shailendra Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 04-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 230 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. 3. The prosecution case in short is that while the informant was returning to his house, at that time, three unknown miscreants intercepted him and also fired upon him due to which he fell down on the road. The miscreants looted silver and gold articles along with cash of Rs. 20,000/- from him and also shot him causing five injuries on his body. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8763 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 2/3 against him and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the FIR. Name of the petitioner surfaced in this case on the basis of his confessional statement of the co-accused Natwar Kumar, which has no evidentiary value in the eye of law. Except confessional statement of the co- accused, there is nothing adverse against the petitioner in the entire record of the case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. Other co- accused Natwar Kumar has already been granted regular bail by this Court vide order dated 08-01-2025, passed in Cr. Misc. No. 89167 of 2024. The petitioner has not been put on Test Identification Parade. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents and is languishing in judicial custody since 18.11.2025 without any rhymes or reason. 5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Having heard rival contention of both the parties and considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, the period of custody of the petitioner as also the prayer being based on parity, let the petitioner, abovenamed, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8763 of 2026(2) dt.04-02-2026 3/3 below/concerned Court in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 230 of 2024. manish/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T