Neutral Citation:________________ Date of reserved for orders : Date of Pronouncement :22.06.2026 Date of uploading : APHC010287322017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] MONDAY,THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3253/2017 Between: 1. K LAKSHMI SRIKAKULAM DIST, W/O.SREERAMULU,AGED45YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/O.GOPALAPURAM VILLAGE,RAJAM MANDALAM,NOW R/O.KANCHARAM VILLAGE,RAJAM MANDAL,SRIKAKULAM DSITRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. Y VERNKAYYA SRIKAKULAM DIST 2 OTHERS, S/O.LATE.BODDIYYA AGED48YEARS, R/O.SC.MADIGA STREET,RAJAM TOWN,RAJAM MANDALAM,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 2. YENDAVA NAGARAJU, S/O.POLLU, AGED 32 YEARS, R/O.SC.MADIGA STREET,RAJAM TOWN,RAJAM MARIDALAM,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. YENDAVAA NAGESWARRAO, S/O.LATE.BODDIYYA AGED 42 YEARS, R/O.SC.MADIGA STREET,RAJAM TOWN,RAJAM MANDAIAM,SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to against the order passed by the Junior Civil Judge Rajam in E.P.no.38/2014,dated: 14-03-2017, in O.S.No.103/2011 IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRPMP 18185 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased - Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. TOTA TEJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A RAVI SHANKAR The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3253 /2017 ORDER: The Civil Revision Petition is filed aggrieved by the order passed by the Junior Civil Judge Rajam in E.P.No.38/2014, dated 14.03.2017 in O.S.No.103/2011. 2. None appeared for the petitioner on the first date of listing of the present revision petition i.e., on 17.07.2017. On 19.06.2026 also, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, this Court posted the matter to 22.06.2026 under the caption ‘For dismissal’. Even today, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner herein is not evincing any interest to prosecute the matter. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 4 35 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3253/2017 22.06.2026 TTPPSS//BBSSPP