Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33779 (PAT)

Universal Ideal Sewa Samiti v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/2118/2026 · 2026-02-13

Rajesh Kumar Verma, Sudhir Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2118 of 2026 ====================================================== Universal Ideal Sewa Samiti a society having its registered office at UISS Skill Center behind Degree College, Dhudhi, Dist.- Sonebhadra, Uttar Pradesh-PIN- 231208, through its authorized representative Aurngjeb Alam, Male Age about 40 Years, Son of Alisher Alam, Resident of 186 Mahuli, Mahuli, PS.Mahuli, PO Mahuli, District- Sonbhadra, Uttar Pradesh, PIN- 231208. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna-01. 2. The Secretary, Youth Employment and Skill Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3. The Mission Director, Bihar Skill Development Mission, Department of Labour Resources, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna -01. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Mrigank Mauli, Sr. Advocate For the State : Mr. Md. Nadim Seraj, GP-5 Mr. Dhuvendra Kumar, AC to GP-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH) 2 13-02-2026 Following is the relief sought for in the present writ application:- “a) For issuance of Writ in nature of Certiorari quashing the Letter No. BSDM/ Domain- 108/2025/2604 dated 27.11.2025 (Annexure P/13 passed by Respondent No. 3 wherein the Petitioner company has been blacklisted for next two years without considering the facts and circumstances of the case. b) For any other relief or reliefs which the petitioners may be found entitles to in the facts Patna High Court CWJC No.2118 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 2/4 and circumstances of the case.” 2. The show-cause issued to the petitioner is Annexure-P/6, which is as follows:- “ la[;k& BSDM/Domain(RFP)-165/2023-3659 fcgkj ljdkj Je lalk/ku foHkkx fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku izs’kd] fe”ku funs”kd fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku] fcgkj] iVukA lsok esa] dsUnz lapkyd] Universal Ideal Sewa Samiti iVuk] fnukad& 22@11@24 fo’k;%& Mksesu fLdfyax ;kstukUrxZr iathd`r vkids dkS”ky izf”k{k.k dsUnz@dsUnzksa esa ekg vxLr ls vDVwcj 2024 esa izf”k{k.kkfFkZ;ksa dh online mifLFkfr ntZ djus esa vfu;ferrk ik;s tkus ds laca/k esaA egk”k;k@egk”k;] mijksDr fo’k; ls laca/k esa lwfpr djuk gS fd ekg vxLr 2024 ls ekg vDVwcj 2024 esa fuEukafdr cSp vkbZ0Mh esa izf”k{k.kkfFkZ;ksa dh vkWuykbZu mifLFkfr ntZ djus ds dze esa vfu;ferrk ikbZ xbZ gS%& dsUnz dk dksM ftyk dk uke cSp vkbZMh ftuesa vfu;ferrk ikbZ xbZ gS DS18961001896000 Gopalganj 13679,13681,12943,12949 DS19520001896000 Saran 14431,14432 DS19584001896000 Saran 14449,14518,14806 mi;qZDr ds laca/k esa vkidks funs”k fn;k tkrk gS fd i= izkfIr ds ,d lIrkg ds vanj lk{; ¼tSls& CCTV Footage bR;kfn½ lfgr bl laca/k esa viuk Li’Vhdj.k v|ksgLrk{kjh dks izLrqr djuk lqfuf”pr djsa] vU;Fkk ;g ekuk tk,xk fd izf”k{k.kkfFkZ;ksa dh vkWuykbZu mifLFkfr ntZ djus esa vkidh laLFkk } kjk vfu;ferrk dh xbZ gS ,oa rnkyksd esa vkidh laLFkk ds fo:) mfpr Patna High Court CWJC No.2118 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 3/4 dkjZokbZ dh tk;sxhA fo”oklHkktu g0@& ¼lqjs”k dqekj flag½ fe”ku funs”kd fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku fcgkj] iVukA Kkikad%& BSDM/Domain(RFP)-165/2023-3659 iVuk] fnukad%& 22@11@24 izfrfyfi%& 1- uksMy inkf/kdkjh] Je lalk/ku foHkkx dks lwpukFkZ ,oa vko”;d dk;kZFk izsf’krA g0@& fe”ku funs”kd fcgkj dkS”ky fodkl fe”ku” 3. Upon bare perusal of the show-cause, it appears that the notice is vague. No specific reasons are indicated, nor is any particular charge alleged against the petitioner. Subsequently, a final order was passed vide Annexure-P/13 dated 27.11.2025. It is noted that neither the show-cause nor the order under challenge specifies the reasons for blacklisting the petitioner. 4. In view of above, order dated 27.11.2025 is set aside. The matter is remitted back to the authority concerned, who shall issue a fresh show-cause notice granting the petitioner liberty to file a reply thereto and, if necessary, afford a personal hearing to the petitioner before passing a final order in accordance with law. Patna High Court CWJC No.2118 of 2026(2) dt.13-02-2026 4/4 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is allowed. 6. Pending application(s), if any shall also stand disposed of. Sachin/- (Sudhir Singh, J) (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) U