SRI RAJVEER v. SMT. BASANTHI RAJ @ KALASURYA BASANTHI
CRL.RP/583/2026 · 2026-04-09
V Srishananda
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3377 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3377 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19837 CRL.RP No. 583 of 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 583 OF 2026 BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJVEER S/O. VEER RAJ HINDU AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.129 NEAR SIDDARTHA SCHOOL KARIHOBANAHALLI VILLAGE NAGASANDRA POST BANGALORE - 560 078. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. R.L.N. MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND:
SMT. BASANTHI RAJ @ KALASURYA BASANTHI D/O. MOTHILAL SINGH W/O. RAJVEER HINDU AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS NOW RESIDING AT NARAYANAPPA BUILDING WARD NO.28 CHIKKABALLAPUR CITY. …RESPONDENT
Digitally signed by MALATESH K C Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19837 CRL.RP No. 583 of 2026
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C. (U/S 438 R/W 442 BNSS) BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING THAT THIS HONOURABLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE THE EXPARTE ORDER PASSED BY THE HON'BLE PRINCIPAL FAMILY JUDGE AT CHIKKABALLAPUR IN CRL. MISC. NO.47/2022 UNDER SECTION 125 OF CR.P.C.
DATED: 8.8.2024.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
ORAL ORDER
1. Office has raised objection with regard to maintainability.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo. Memo reads as under:
"The petitioner in the above case prays this Hon'ble Court pleased to dismiss as withdraw and liberty to file afresh under the provision of law in the interest of justice."
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:19837 CRL.RP No. 583 of 2026
3. Placing the memo on record, criminal revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
4. Time spent before the Court in this revision petition shall be excluded while computing the period of limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
5. Office is directed to return the certified copy of the impugned order after keeping the photocopy.
Sd/- (V SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
SNC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 15