KULWANT SINGH ALIAS MP v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/7192/2026 · 2026-07-27
Anoop Chitkara, To Be Nominated
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33766 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRWP-7192-2026 280 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-7192-2026
JUDGMENT RESERVED ON
JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED ON OPERATIVE
PART PRONOUNCED OR FULL UPLOADED ON 21.07.2026 27.07.2026 FULL PRONOUNCED 27.07.2026 Kulwant Singh @ MP ...Petitioner Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP CHITKARA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI Present: Mr. Ranwant Singh Sangha, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Pooja Nayar Sharma, D.A.G., Punjab. **** ANOOP CHITKARA, J.
1. Seeking quashing of impugned order dated 01.06.2026 passed by respondent No.2 whereby parole of the petitioner has been rejected under the Punjab Good Prisoners (Temporary) Release Act, the petitioner has come up before this Court by filing the present petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India r/w 482 CrPC.
2. Counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated 01.06.2026 passed by Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Moga (Annexure P-2), the parole of the petitioner was rejected based on the report that two more cases have been registered against the petitioner and his family members have not recorded any statement nor they have taken any responsibility and it is clear that if the petitioner is released on parole, he may indulge in selling intoxicating substances, which can disturb the peace and order of the area.
3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner undertakes not to indulge in any crime and if he commits any offence which prescribes sentence for more than 03 years, then such factor should be considered while granting subsequent parole.
4. Perusal of the order reflects that there is no reasoning in the order that how petitioner’s release is threat to law and order, as such order dated 01.06.2026 passed by Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, Hoshiarpur (Annexure P-2) is set aside. Respondent No.2 is directed to pass a fresh order within a period of 15 days. 1 JYOTI SHARMA 2026.07.27 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh
CRWP-7192-2026
5. Petition stands allowed. All pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP CHITKARA) JUDGE (RAMESH CHANDER DIMRI) JUDGE 27.07.2026 Jyoti Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No. 2 JYOTI SHARMA 2026.07.27 16:52 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment High Court, Sector 1, Chandigarh