ANITA DEVI W/O SHRI RAMAVTAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5954/2026 · 2026-04-30
Pramil Kumar Mathur
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3376 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3376 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:18389] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5954/2026 Anita Devi W/o Shri Ramavtar, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Arniya Neel, Police Station Mehandwas, Presently Residing At Plot No. 38, Krishna Sarovar Colony, Shikarpura, Jaipur, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In Central Jail Jaipur, District Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kunal Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR
Order 30/04/2026
1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.240/2026 registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for offences under Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act, 1985.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a 45-year-old woman who has been implicated in the present case on false and concocted grounds. It is alleged that 8.25 grams of smack, along with ₹1,400/- purportedly being sale proceeds, was recovered from her conscious possession, which is below the commercial quantity. The petitioner has been in custody since
29.03.2026. It is further submitted that she has two prior criminal antecedents under the Excise Act, both of a different nature. The
[2026:RJ-JP:18389] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5954/2026] trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed.
4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application.
5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner.
6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Anita Devi W/o Shri Ramavtar, be released on bail provided she furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that she shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial.
(PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/91