1 CGHC010318212026 2026:CGHC:38207 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 796 of 2026 1 - Smt. Manjulata Bhoy W/o Meghnath Bhoy Aged About 39 Years Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Aurda, Block Pussore, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Applicant Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director (Education) Education Division Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Collector District Raigarh (C.G.) 5 - District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh (C.G.) 6 - Block Education Officer Pussore, District Raigarh (C.G.) 7 - Smt. Munubai Sarthi Presently Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.) At Govt. Primary School, Gorradipa, Block Pussore, District Raigarh (C.G.) ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Govind Prasad Dewangan, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Nitansh Kumar Jaiswal, Panel Lawyer 2 Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board 25.08.2026 1. Applicant has filed this MCC seeking modification/correction in the order dated 28.02.2026 passed by this Court in writ petition bearing WPS No. 12016 of 2025. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in paragraph no. 8 due to typographical error instead of “rationalization” the word “regularization” has been mentioned. As the writ petition is filed challenging the posting of petitioner(therein) under the Rationalization Policy of the State Government, therefore, proper order after correcting the said typographical error may be passed. 3. Learned counsel for the State do not dispute the submission made by learned counsel for the applicant. 4. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties as also perused the order dated 28.02.2026 passed in writ petition bearing WPS No. 12016 of 2025. 5. From perusal of the pleadings made in the writ petition as also from the paragraph no. 1 to 7 of the order dated 28.02.2026 passed in the said writ petition, I am of the considered view that in the third line of paragraph no. 8 the word “regularization” has been mentioned due to typographical error instead of “rationalization”, therefore, it is directed that in paragraph no. 8 of the order dated 28.02.2026 the word “regularization” be read as “rationalization”. It is ordered accordingly. 6. Registry is directed to make this order as part of record of WPS No. 12016 of 2025. 3 7. With the aforementioned observation and direction this MCC stands disposed of. Certified copy as per rules. Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Dey SHUBHAM DEY Digitally signed by SHUBHAM DEY