Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33754 (CHH)

ANKIT KUMAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/3066/2024 · 2026-08-24

Shri Bibhu Datta Guru

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 CGHC010159872024 2026:CGHC:38019 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3066 of 2024 Ankit Kumar S/o Shri Lallu Ram Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Rampur Block Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Collector Surguja Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 3 - Chief Executive O1cer Jila Panchayat Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive O1cer Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur, District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) SHOAIB ANWAR Digitally signed by SHOAIB ANWAR Date: 2026.08.25 16:17:37 +0530 2 WPS No. 3691 of 2024 Ankit Kumar S/o Shri Lallu Ram, Aged About 29 Years R/o Village Rampur Block Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) ---Petitioner(s) Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development Mahahanadi Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Surguja, Ambikapur District Surguja (C.G.) 3 - Chief Executive O1cer, Jila Panchayat Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 4 - Chief Executive O1cer Janpad Panchayat Ambikapur, District Surguja (C.G.) 5 - Ravishankar Das S/o Sabh Das, Aged About 43 Years R/o Village Katkalo, P.S. And Tehsil Darima, District Surguja (C.G.) --- Respondent(s) (Cause title taken from CIS) For Petitioner(s) : Shri Nishi Kant Sinha, Advocate For Respondents/State : Ms.Sakshi Bajpai, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 4 : Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate appears on behalf of Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate 3 Hon’ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru, Judge Order on Board 25.08.2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to withdraw the present writ petitions with liberty to :le fresh petitions, if cause of action arises. 2. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. 3. Accordingly, the writ petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) JUDGE shoaib