D/L8 05.08.2026 Bpg. C.R.M. (M) 1822 of 2026 In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023; Soumyendu Adhikari Versus The State of West Bengal & Anr. Mr. Rajdeep Sengupta. …for the petitioner. Mr. Somopriya Chowdhury Mr. Arup Kumar Bhowmick. …for the State. Mr. Sabir Ahmed Mr. Dhiman Banerjee. …for the de facto complainant. Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he has instruction not to proceed with the bail application. Learned advocate for the State as also the learned advocate for the de facto complainant is present. Accordingly, CRM(M)1822 of 2026 is dismissed as not pressed. Written instructions submitted by the petitioner be kept with the record. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Tirthankar Ghosh, J.) 2