1 CGHC010230612026 2026:CGHC:36758-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1627 of 2026 1 - Birbal Nishad S/o Uttam Nishad, Aged About 38 Years, R/o Gujrati Samaj Tikrapara, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Dageshwari Nishad W/o Birbal Nishad, Aged About 37 Years, R/o Gujrati Samaj Tikrapara, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioners versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh, Through- Police Station A.J.K, District- Bilaspur (C.G.) 2 - Rammuni Ekka W/o Late Pranjal Ekka, Aged About 46 Years R/o Shri Shyam Residency Behtarai Road Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioners : Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate. For State : Ms. Anusha Naik, Deputy Govt. Advocate. For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Manish Nigam, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 18.08.2026 1. Heard Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Ms. Anusha Nayak, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.08.25 22:27:35 +0530 2 appearing for the State and Mr. Manish Nigam, learned counsel for respondent No.2. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the F.I.R no. 04/2026 dated 04.04.2026 and all others subsequent proceedings emanating there from, registered at Police Station AJAK Sarkanda, District Bilaspur against the petitioner for the offence punishable under section 296, 115(2), 351(3), and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) alongside Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, in the interest of justice. 3. Mr. Amit Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that in the present case, investigation has been concluded and charge- sheet has been submitted in the Court concerned. Therefore, the present petition may be dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy for quashing of the charge sheet. 4. Ms. Anusha Nayak, learned Deputy Govt. Advocate appearing for the State/respondent No.1 as well as Mr. Manish Nigam, learned counsel for respondent No.2 have no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioners to take recourse to law if aggrieved by the charge-sheet, if so advised. 3 6. The interim order dated 01.07.2026 stands vacated. I.A. No.02/2026 also stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Aadil