IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 143 CRM-M-40927-2026 Date of Decision: 27.07.2026 Shalika Wadhwa alias Navneet Kaur …Petitioner V/s Union Territory, Chandigarh and another …Respondents CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKRAM AGGARWAL Present: Mr. Rohit Khullar, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Arora, APP, U.T. Chandigarh. Ms. Anjana Thakur, Advocate, for respondent No.2. *** VIKRAM AGGARWAL, J (ORAL) The prayer in the present petition is for quashing of FIR No.138, dated 30.08.2024 registered under Sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B IPC at Police Station South Sector 34, Chandigarh along with all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom on the basis of a compromise dated 20.11.2025 arrived at between the petitioner and respondent No. 2. 2. At the outset, learned State counsel has submitted that the petition is not filed on behalf of all accused since one Joban Sandhu is also an accused. 3. On an argument by learned counsel for the petitioner that the name of Joban Sandhu stands dropped, learned State counsel, on instructions, submits that Joban Sandhu is still an accused in the FIR in question. 4. That being so, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the instant petition, at this stage. VIKAS CHANDER 2026.07.27 17.33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-40927-2026 -2- 5. In view of the statement given by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as having been withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (VIKRAM AGGARWAL) JUDGE July 27, 2026 vcgarg Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIKAS CHANDER 2026.07.27 17.33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document