Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33737 (PNJ)

UNION OF INDIA AND ORS v. CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL CHANDIGARH AND ANR

CWP/19474/2026 · 2026-07-24

Harsimran Singh Sethi, Vikas Suri

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 112 CWP-19474-2026 (O&M) Decided on : 24.07.2026 Union of India and others ...Petitioner. Versus Central Administrative Tribunal Chandigarh and another . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS SURI PRESENT: None. **** HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI , J. (Oral) 1. The aforesaid petition was e-filed. The petition was scrutinized and approved by the Registry, but after its approval, hard copy, which is mandatory, has not been supplied. Registry has reported that duplicate case bearing CWP No. 8192 of 2025 has already been disposed of by this Court. The Registry has consequently listed the matter before this Court being duplicate and incomplete case seeking appropriate orders. 2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in pursuing the present writ petition being duplicate and incomplete. The writ petition, as such is disposed of for want of requisite action from the counsel. File be consigned to record room. (HARSIMRAN SINGH SETHI) JUDGE ( VIKAS SURI ) JUDGE 24.07.2026 Riya Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No RIYA 2026.07.27 09:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document