Siranjeevi v. The State rep by, The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/12695/2026 · 2026-06-10
C Kumarappan
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33730 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 33730 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.12695 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 10.06.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE C.KUMARAPPAN Crl.O.P.No.12695 of 2026 Siranjeevi ... Petitioner Vs. The State Represented by The Inspector of Police, Pallipattu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. (Crime No.222 of 2025) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, Act, 2023, praying to enlarge the petitioner on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.222 of 2025 pending on the file of the respondent police. For Petitioner : Mr.O.Ravi For Respondent : Mrs.R.S.Indira, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R The petitioner apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 331(4) and 305(a) of BNS, in Crime No.222 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.12695 of 2026
2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner, along with the other accused, trespassed into the de facto complainant’s house and robbed Rs.85,000/- cash, 13 sovereigns of gold jewels and 923 grams of silver. Hence, the case.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is an innocent person and has been falsely implicated in this case. He would submit that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) appearing for the respondent police opposed the anticipatory bail on the ground that there are 11 previous cases pending against the petitioner.
5. Taking into consideration of totality of the circumstances and the fact that previous criminal antecedents pending against the petitioner, and that the stolen articles are yet to be recovered, this Court is of the firm view that the petitioner does not deserve the relief of anticipatory bail. 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.12695 of 2026
6. Accordingly, the Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 10.06.2026 cda To 1.The District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Pallipattu. 2.The Inspector of Police, Pallipattu Police Station, Thiruvallur District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.12695 of 2026 C.KUMARAPPAN.J. cda Crl.OP.No.12695 of 2026 10.06.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis