SIKAKOLLI PHANINDRA VARUN MANI KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA
WP/8448/2026 · 2026-06-21
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3373 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3373 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation:_________________
Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : 22-06-2026 Date of uploading
: 29-06-2026
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION Nos.8448 and 20 of 2026
COMMON ORDER:
Aggrieved by the action of respondents in freezing/blocking the petitioners’ savings Bank accounts maintained with their respective banks pursuant to the complaint/notice issued by respondent No.3 respectively, the present Writ Petitions have been filed.
2. Sri Kondeti Ranga Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that though the petitioner’s bank accounts were initially frozen, the respective banks have subsequently defreezed the accounts except to the extent of the disputed amount. Hence, there is nothing survives for adjudication and prayed to close the Writ Petitions.
3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petitions are closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________________
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 22.06.2026 MP
Whether the order is: Speaking Reasoned
Reportable
Non-reportable
2
127
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI
WRIT PETITION Nos.8448 and 20 of 2026 Dated: 22.06.2026
MP