Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010138932021 NC: 2026:KHC:44701 RFA No. 303 of 2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.303 OF 2021 (DEC) BETWEEN:
SMT. SHANKARAMMA M.M., W/O SRI G. GURURAJ, AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.5, 18TH MAIN, MUNESHWARA BLOCK, BANGALORE SOUTH, BANGALORE – 560 026. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANJANNA M S., ADVOCATE(ABSENT) AND:
1.
THE COMMISSIONER, BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE BANGALORE.
2.
THE REGISTARA BIRTH AND DEATH BRUHAT BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE, BANGALORE. …RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.02.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.25766/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE MAYOHALL UNIT, BANGALORE. DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka
- 2 -
HC-KAR
CNR: KAHC010138932021 NC: 2026:KHC:44701 RFA No. 303 of 2021
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF
ORAL JUDGMENT
Though this Court on 01.06.2021 and 02.06.2025
directed the appellant to take steps, the Office Note indicates that in view of the orders dated 01.06.2021, 16.02.2023, 24.02.2023, 14.07.2023 and 02.06.2025, needful has not been done. This shows that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/- (T.M.NADAF) JUDGE
DR List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5 ct-vn