Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3370 (ALL)

AJIT PRATAP SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/6213/2026 · 2026-05-05

Saurabh Shyam Shamshery

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 6213 of 2026 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE SAURABH SHYAM SHAMSHERY, J. 1. Heard Sri Adarsh Singh, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-Respondents. 2. At this stage, the Court is not entering into merit of case since counsel for parties fairly submit that at first instance matter can be considered by concerned respondent so far as ad hoc service for purpose of pension is concerned in the light of a judgment passed by a Coordinate Bench of this Court in Kunwar Pal vs. State of U.P. and others, 2026:AHC:85048. 3. Taking note of aforesaid submissions, the writ petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to petitioner to approach the concerned respondent. May 6, 2026 AK Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Adarsh Singh, Pragyanshu Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Saurabh Shyam Shamshery,J.) Ajit Pratap Singh .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AWADESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad