Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3369 (GAU)

HORESH GOGOI v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR

I.A.(Crl.)/178/2026 · 2026-03-24

Rajesh Mazumdar

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010032992026 2026:GAU-AS:4492 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/178/2026 HORESH GOGOI S/O MINESWAR GOGOI, R/O MORAN MILONPUR, P.O. MORANHAT, P.S. MORAN, IN THE DIST. OF DIBRUGARH, ASSAM, PIN 785670 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM. 2:SRI RAJU BORAH S/O MONIRAM BORAH R/O OUPHALIA CHARIALI P.O. OUPHALIA P.S. TINGKHONG IN THE DIT. OF DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 78661 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KALITA, MR. N M DAS,MR. J HATIMURIA Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 25.03.2026 Heard Mr M Kalita, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr K K Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. Page No.# 2/2 None appears for the respondent No. 2. 2. Notice in the interlocutory application (criminal) had been issued on 23.02.2026. 3. The Office Note reflects that the respondent No. 2 had been served. 4. This interlocutory application has been instituted for condonation of delay of 28 days in filing the connected criminal appeal. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor does not object to the condonation of delay. 7. In view of the statements made in the IA(Crl.), this Court deems it fit to condone the delay caused in filing of the criminal appeal. 8. Accordingly, the delay in filing the criminal appeal is condoned. 9. Interlocutory Application stands disposed of. 10. Registry to register the connected criminal appeal and list it accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant