PAWAN KUMAR JAIN S/O LATE SHRI DHARAMCHAND JAIN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/3882/2026 · 2026-04-27
Sangeeta Sharma
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3367 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 3367 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:17655] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3882/2026 Pawan Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Dharamchand Jain, Aged 47 Years, R/o House No. 80/12, Arya Samaj Road, P.S. Kotwali, Kota City. (Accused Petitioner At Present Confined In Central Jail Kota). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Laxmi Bhardwaj on behalf of Mr. D.N. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Vivek Yadav for Dr. Mahesh Sharma HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA
Order 27/04/2026
1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioner under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 08/2026 registered at Police Station Kishorepura, District Kota City for the offence(s) punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the accused-petitioner is in custody since
21.02.2026. He further submits that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner. It is also submitted that the accused-petitioner and complainant are brother and sister. He also submits that civil litigation is pending between the parties and further submits that the accused-petitioner is not
[2026:RJ-JP:17655] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3882/2026] required for further investigation; conclusion of trial will take its own time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the accused-petitioner behind the bars and, therefore, prays that the accused-petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS.
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as counsel for complainant vehemently opposes the submissions made by
learned counsel for the accused-petitioner hereinabove.
4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the fact that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the accused-petitioner; that the accused-petitioner and complainant are brother and sister; that the accused-petitioner is in custody since 21.02.2026; that trial will take its own time. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case, deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
5. Therefore, the instant bail application under Section 483 BNSS is accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioner Pawan Kumar Jain S/o Late Shri Dharamchand Jain is ordered to be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court, with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
6. The observation made hereinabove is only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner.
[2026:RJ-JP:17655] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3882/2026]
7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance.
(SANGEETA SHARMA),J PUNEET KUMAR/23