HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 17753 of 2026 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR NIGAM, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned Standing Counsel raised a preliminary objection that dispute of the petitioner is with private individual i.e. respondent No. 5 and such a writ petition is not maintainable. 3. In view of the above, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter. 4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the remedy as available to him under law. May 6, 2026 Nitika Sri. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Akshay Kumar Shukla, Ravindra Pal Singh Kashyap Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Sher Bahadur Singh (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Ramashrey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NITIKA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad