Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33668 (KAR)

SMT GANGAMMA v. THE BENGALURU DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD

WP/12147/2022 · 2026-08-03

M G S Kamal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010269312022 NC: 2026:KHC:40444 WP No. 12147 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF AUGUST, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL WRIT PETITION NO. 12147 OF 2022 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SMT GANGAMMA W/O LATE G SHIVANNA AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT KUMBARA BEEDHI, 3rd BLOCK, KUDUR, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANGARA DISTRICT- 561101 PRESENTLY R/AT NANJUNDESHWARA NILAYA LAXMIDEVI NAGAR, KUDUR, MAGADI TALUK RAMANGARA DISTRICT- 561101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANANTHANARAYANA K S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE BENGALURU DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD., NO. 2, G.M.C. BANK CAMPUS, PAMPAMHAKAVI ROAD, CHAMRAJPET, BENGALURU- 560018 REP BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Digitally signed by NIRMALA DEVI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010269312022 NC: 2026:KHC:40444 WP No. 12147 of 2022 2. THE BENGALURU DISTRICT CENTRAL CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD., KUDUR BRANCH OPP SBI KUDUR, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT- 561 101 REP BY ITS MANAGER. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. N SHIVAKUMAR., ADVOCATE) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTICE DTD.23.5.2022 ISSUED BY THE R0-2 NO.67/2022-23 VIDE ANNEXURE-A., AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL ORAL ORDER After arguing the matter for sometime, on a query by this Court regarding the maintenability of the writ petition, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks withdrawal of the petition with liberty to avail alternate remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law. - 3 - HC-KAR CNR: KAHC010269312022 NC: 2026:KHC:40444 WP No. 12147 of 2022 2. He submits that the interim order granted by this Court be extended for a period of 60 days enabling the petitioner to avail such remedy. 3. His submission is placed on record. 4. Interim order, if any, granted by this Court is extended for a period of 60 days enabling the petitioner to avail such remedy as sought for. 5. Reserving such liberty, petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE Vmb List No.: 1 Sl No.: 29