Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3366 (AP)

NEELISETTI YAGNA NARAYANA PRASAD v. SANIGEPALLI VENKATA BRUNDA DEVI

CRP/1613/2026 · 2026-06-18

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010240792026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] FRIDAY,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1613/2026 Between: 1. NEELISETTI YAGNA NARAYANA PRASAD, S/O. PANDURANGA RAO, AGED 58 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O PLOT NO.U-1, A- BLOCK, GARDEN TOWERS, NEAR ACHALANANDA ASRAMAM, MANGAMURU DONAK, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. SANIGEPALLI VENKATA BRUNDA DEVI, W/O MOHAN RAO, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, R/O PLOT NO.403, SUBHA PRAKASH TOWERS, COURT CENTER, ONGOLE TOWN, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523 001. 2. THATA AUDILAKSHMI, W/O RUSHIKESWARA RAO, AGED 47 YEARS, R/O SAI RESIDENCY, 3RD LANE, BHAGYANAGAR, NOW RESIDING AT THATA BUILDINGS, OLD GOVERNMENT HOSPITAL ROAD, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT - 523 001. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to aggrieved by the non-disposal of I.A. No. 376 of 2025 in O.S. No. 597 of 2025 on the file of the Court of Learned I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ongole, the above-named petitioner prefers this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition for the following among other IA NO: 1 OF 2026 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to dispense with filing of certified copy of Docket Proceedings passed in I.A. No. 376 of 2025 in O.S. No. 597 of 2025 on the file of the Court of Learned I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ongole and to receive the main CRP on file, in the interests of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. NIMMAGADDA REVATHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: 3 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1613/2026 ORDER:- The Civil Revision Petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India aggrieved by the non-disposal of I.A.No.376 of 2025 in O.S.No.597 of 2025 on the file of the Court of I Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division), Ongole. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. As issuance of notices to the respondents is not necessary in this matter, hence notices to the respondents is hereby dispensed with. 3. The petitioner herein is plaintiff and the respondents herein are defendants in the suit. For the sake of convenience the parties herein are referred as arrayed in the suit. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the plaintiff filed the suit for permanent injunction in respect of the suit schedule property. The plaintiff also filed I.A.No.376 of 2025 seeking ad-interim injunction regarding suit schedule property. After filing the said I.A., the defendants filed counter- affidavit and an advocate commissioner was also appointed to note down the physical features of the suit schedule property. Accordingly, the Advocate Commissioner submitted report. Even after submission of the report as well as completion of the pleadings, the trial Court not disposed of the I.A. even after lapse of seven months. Hence, the Civil Revision Petition. 4 5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is observed that the defendants filed counter and Advocate Commissioner also submitted report. In view of the completion of the pleadings in respect of I.A.No.376 of 2025, the trial Court can conduct enquiry and dispose of the I.A. at the earliest. Therefore, the trial Court is directed to dispose of the I.A.No.376 of 2025 as early as possible after conducting a detailed enquiry as required, within a period of three(3) months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. However, the plaintiff/petitioner herein and the defendants/respondents herein are directed to cooperate for enquiry without requesting any adjournments hereafter. 6. With the above direction, the Civil Revision Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 19.06.2026 TPS/BSP 5 58 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1613/2026 19.06.2026 TPS/BSP