Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3365 (JHR)

UPENDRA YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./12045/2025 · 2026-04-01

Pradeep Kumar Srivastava

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:9150 1 | P a g e IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.12045 of 2025 Upendra Yadav, aged about 22 years, S/o. Sona Yadav, R/o. Vill.- Kotwardih, P.O. & P.S.- Chandwara, Dist.- Koderma, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Choubey, Adv. For the State : Mr. Santosh Kumar Shukla, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda, Adv. Order No.05/Dated- 01.04.2026 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. 2. The petitioner has been made an accused in connection with Chandwara P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025, registered for offences punishable under Sections 191(2), 190, 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 303(2) and 352 of the B.N.S., 2023, which is pending in the Court of learned J.M.F.C., Koderma. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence at all rather he has been falsely implicated in this case. It is further submitted that there is allegation against petitioner of giving single blow on the head of the informant. It is further submitted that medical examination report of the informant shows that there is mild depression of skull bone causing indentation on adjacent brain parenchyma and fracture of mastoid part of left temporal bone. It is also submitted that petitioner was discharged on the same day. It is also submitted that petitioner is in custody since 12.11.2025. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of the case and abides by all terms and 2026:JHHC:9150 2 | P a g e conditions which may be imposed. Hence, the petitioner may be admitted to bail. 4. Learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.F.C., Koderma in connection with Chandwara P.S. Case No. 26 of 2025 with condition that petitioner shall appear physically on each and every date during the trial of case till its conclusion unless his physical appearance is dispensed with for sufficient cause to the satisfaction of the learned trial court and with further condition that petitioner shall not indulge in tampering with the prosecution evidence or influence the witnesses or gain over them. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 01.04.2026 Rahul Uploaded on 02/04/2026