Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 3365 (AP)

Barnala Radha v. State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/16308/2026 · 2026-06-22

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of Pronouncement : 23.06.2026 Date of Uploading : 23.06.2026 APHC010308172026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] TUESDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 16308/2026 Between: 1. BARNALA RADHA, W/O MADHUSUDHANA RAO, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC FIELD ASSISTANT (SUSPENSION), RIO. KONDADADI VILLAGE, GARIVIDI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT , VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.522 237. 2. PROJECT DIRECTORCUMADDITIONAL DISTRICT PROGRAMME COORDINATOR OF MGNREGS, DISTRICT WATER MANAGEMENT AGENCY, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 535 002. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more 2 particularly one, in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the impugned proceedings in Rc.No.1564/2025/HR, dt. 23.03.2026 issued by the 2nd respondent thereby suspended the Petitioner from the post of Field Assistant, working in Kondadadi Gram Panchayat, Garividi Mandal, Vizianagaram District, as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, contrary to the provisions of National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme Act, 2005 and offends Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set aside the proceedings dt.23.03.2026 and direct the 2nd respondent to reinstate the petitioner into service for the said post and pass such other order. IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to pay the pending salaries to the petitioner for the period from 28-06-2024 to 30-11-2025 forthwith by the considering the Letters dt.29-09-2025 and 02-05-2026 submitted by the 5th respondent to the 4th respondent by requesting to pay the pending salaries to the petitioner, pending disposal of the main writ petition and pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVAS AMBATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I The Court made the following: 3 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.16308 of 2026 ORDER: 1. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive for adjudication in view of the subsequent developments and no orders are required to be passed. 2. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. 3. No order as to costs. 4. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 23.06.2026 IS Whether the Order is: Speaking Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.16308 of 2026 Date: 23.06.2026 IS