Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 33645 (MAD)

Tamilselvan v. The State Rep By, The Sub-Inspector Of Police

CRL OP/14758/2026 · 2026-06-11

G K Ilanthiraiyan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 14758 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 11-06-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN CRL OP No. 14758 of 2026 Tamilselvan S/o.Thangarasu, No.2/158, Mariyamman Kovil Street, Kanangur, Kallakurichi - 606 203. ..Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep By, The Sub-Inspector Of Police DCB, Cuddalore District. Crime No.11 of 2026 ..Respondent(s) Prayer: Criminal Original Petitions filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in crime No.11 of 2026 pending on the file of the respondent police and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): Mr. S.Sudhanthiran For Respondent(s): Mr.S.Yogaraja Sekar, Counsel for Government of Tamilnadu, (Crl.Side) __________ Page1 of4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14758 of 2026 ORDER The petitioner, who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 18.05.2026 for the offence punishable under Section 318(3) and 318(4) of BNS, 2023 in crime No.11 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police, seek bail. 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with others have cheated 37 victims to the tune of Rs.75,00,000/- under the guise of job racketing which led to the registration of an FIR. Hence, the present petition has been filed by the petitioner for seeking bail. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner is an innocent, he has not committed any such offence as alleged by the prosecution and a false case has been foisted against him. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody from 18.05.2026 and he is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays to grant bail to the petitioner. 4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that there is __________ Page2 of4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14758 of 2026 specific overt act against the petitioner and the investigation is pending in this case. Hence, he vehemently opposed to grant bail to the petitioners. 5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) and perused the materials available on records. 6. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner and other have committed serious offence, the investigation is pending and if the petitioner is released on bail, he will indulge in similar kind of offences. Hence, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition stands dismissed. 11-06-2026 VV To 1. The Sub Inspector of Police, DCB, Cuddalore District. 2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras __________ Page3 of4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 14758 of 2026 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN, J. VV CRL OP No. 14758 of 2026 11-06-2026 __________ Page4 of4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis