20.08.2026 Item No.21 Court No.551 KS Allowed In The High Court at Calcutta Appellate Side C.R.M. (A) 2469 of 2026 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, in connection with Kumarganj Police Station Case No.184 of 2026 dated 27.05.2026 under Sections 316(2)/ 316(5)/ 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, pending before the A.C.J.M, Gangarampur at Buniadpur, Dakshin Dinajpur (Corresponding to G.R. Case No.954/2026). And In the matter of: Mosaraf Hossen @ Mosaraf Hossen Mandal ...… Petitioner Mr. Mazhar Hossain Chowdhury Ms. Minoti Gomes .…For the Petitioner Mr. L. Vishal Kumar Mr. Arka Naha .…For the State 1. Petitioner is represented. 2. Learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to political rivalry and prays for anticipatory bail. 3. Learned advocate for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He places a Memo of Evidence. From such Memo of Evidence it transpires that the petitioner allegedly took Rs.8,00,000/- from the de facto complainant out of the total 2 demand of Rs.12,00,000/- for providing job. Such incident took place in the year 2023. 4. It is the further allegation that on May 13, 2026 when the complainant went to the de facto complainant for demanding back the money advanced to the petitioner, he was threatened by the petitioner. On such pretext, the instant case has initiated. 5. Learned advocate for the State has drawn my attention to any contemporary complaint lodged by the de facto complainant, at the time when the money was demanded or paid in the year 2023. 6. In such circumstance, considering the aforesaid materials, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. 7. Accordingly, I direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, corresponding to Section 482(2) of the BNSS and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once in a fortnight till the conclusion of investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on 3 and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. 8. The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. 9. Accordingly, C.R.M. (A) 2469 of 2026 stands disposed of. (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)