IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 110 CWP-17136-2026 (O&M) Date of decision: 27.07.2026 HAFED EMPLOYEES UNION AND ANOTHER ... Petitioners Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : Mr. Ravinder Malik, Advocate, for the petitioners. Mr. Udit Garg, Addl. AG, Haryana Mr. Vikrant Pamboo, Advocate and Mr. Deepak Chauhan, Advocate for respondent Nos.4 and 5. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not press the present petition qua petitioner No.1. 2. Ordered accordingly. 3. Learned counsel submits that the luster lost wheat on account of less gain, is not a misconduct as per Rules, this aspect, he submits, be taken into account by the Enquiry Officer as also letter dated 23.02.2026, Annexure P18 and prays that the same be decided in a time bound manner. 4. Learned State counsel submits that in case petitioner No.2 cooperates with the enquiry, it shall be concluded, within a period of 4 months, in accordance with law, taking note of the submission hereinabove, which satisfies learned counsel opposite. 5. Disposed of accordingly. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) 27.07.2026 JUDGE ashok Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No ASHOK KUMAR 2026.07.27 18:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document