CWP-15590-2026 [1] 117 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15590-2026 Date of decision: 23.07.2026 Kishan Lal ...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and others ...Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBHAS MEHLA Present: Mr. Gaurav Tyagi, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Deepak Bhardwaj, Addl. A.G. Haryana. Mr. Bhupender Singh, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3. **** VIKAS BAHL, J. (ORAL) 1. This is a Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the action of the respondents in failing to rehabilitate the petitioner as per details given in Annexure P-11, P-12, P-17 & P-18 dated 02.04.2014, 25.07.2014, 03.02.2025 & 05.12.2025 respectively, in view of the state Government Policy dated 01.06.2021 (Annexure P-19) and 19.04.2023 (Annexure P-20) and also for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing/setting aside the Show Cause Notice dated 05.09.2022 (Annexure P-16) for vacation of the premises in question. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is only PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.27 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CWP-15590-2026 [2] during the pendency of the present writ petition, the petitioner has learnt that the Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, Gurugram, vide order dated 02.09.2021 had decided the appeal filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the petitioner was not informed about the decision in the said appeal which fact is also apparent from the subsequent show cause notice dated 05.09.2022 and has submitted that in case revision petition is filed within a period of one month from today, Revisional Authority be directed to consider the same and not to dismiss the same solely on the ground of limitation. It is submitted that thus, he seeks to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to seek alternative remedy in accordance with law. 4. Keeping in view the abovesaid facts and circumstances, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty aforesaid. 5. In case legal remedy is availed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today then the competent authority is directed not to dismiss the same solely on the ground of limitation. (VIKAS BAHL) JUDGE (SUBHAS MEHLA) JUDGE 23.07.2026 Pawan Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes/No Whether reportable:- Yes/No PAWAN KUMAR 2026.07.27 11:08 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document